DSpace Repository

Qualitative and quantitative parameters analyses of buffalo ovaries

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Islam, Muhammad Rakibul
dc.contributor.author Asad, Lam Yea
dc.contributor.author Ratul, Md Abdur Raihan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-20T10:03:42Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-20T10:03:42Z
dc.date.issued 2024-09
dc.identifier.citation Islam, M. R., Asad, L. Y., & Ratul, M. A. R. (2024). Qualitative and quantitative parameters analyses of buffalo ovaries. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, 11(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v11i2.75979 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v11i2.75979
dc.description.abstract Buffalo ovaries were collected from abattoirs in Dhaka city. During collection, left and right ovaries were identified and recorded. After processing, the ovaries were categorized as (i) ovaries without corpus luteum (CL) and (ii) ovaries with corpus luteum (CL). Ovaries were then evaluated based on length (cm), width (cm), weight (g), total number of follicles on the surface of each category of ovaries, number of follicles aspirated, and total number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs). The experiment's findings indicated variations in the parameters related to the left and right ovarian categories. The CL% (27.12±0.11%) found highest in the right compared to the left (3.24±0.11%). The length (cm), width (cm), and weight (g) (2.75±0.06, 2.17±0.05, 4.74±0.13) were found significantly (p<0.01) higher in the right ovaries compared to left (2.27±0.06, 1.77±0.05, 3.90±0.13). The number of follicles in total and number of follicles aspirated were found significantly (p<0.01) higher (6.35±0.16 & 5.47±0.16) in the left ovaries compared to right (6.16±0.16 & 4.18±0.16). The number of normal COCs and total COCs was significantly (p<0.01) higher in the left ovaries (0.98±0.134 & 1.57±0.17) compared to right (0.84±0.16 & 1.54±0.17). The abnormal COCs were significantly (p<0.01) higher in the right ovaries (0.75±0.107) compared to left (0.57±0.107). Regarding ovarian categories; (76.47±0.01%) showed ovaries without CL, whereas (23.53±0.01%) showed ovaries with CL. The weight (g) was found significantly (p<0.01) higher in ovaries with CL (4.73±0.12) compared to ovaries without CL (4.36±0.12). The number of follicles in total and aspirated were found significantly (p<0.01) higher in ovaries without CL (7.60±0.14 & 5.28 ±0.14) compared to ovaries with CL (4.29±0.14 & 2.29±0.14). Regarding the number of total COCs, ovaries without CL showed a significantly (p<0.01) higher number of total COCs (1.41±0.11) compared to ovaries with CL (1.17±0.11), where the number of normal and abnormal COCs (0.55±0.01 & 0.86±0.03) were found significantly (p<0.01) higher in ovary without CL compared to the ovary with CL (0.5±0.01 & 0.54±0.03). Finally, it can be concluded that the left and ovaries without CL contain more follicles in total and aspirated and normal COCs. Thus, the left and ovaries without CL are best for collecting quality COCs in buffaloes. Res. Agric. Livest. Fish. Vol. 11, No. 2, August 2024: 125-135 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries en_US
dc.subject Buffalo en_US
dc.subject Ovary en_US
dc.subject Corpus luteum en_US
dc.subject Follicle en_US
dc.title Qualitative and quantitative parameters analyses of buffalo ovaries en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account