<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Year 2008</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2776" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2776</id>
<updated>2026-04-18T14:15:48Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-18T14:15:48Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>STUDY OF FLOWERING PATTERN AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENY IN MUNGBEAN</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/324" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>RAHMAN, MD. MIZANUR</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/324</id>
<updated>2019-10-02T04:51:16Z</updated>
<published>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">STUDY OF FLOWERING PATTERN AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENY IN MUNGBEAN
RAHMAN, MD. MIZANUR
A pot experiment was conducted at the Iangladesh InsLitute ol Nuclear&#13;
ALricutture. Mvrnensingh, during September to November 2007 to investigate flower&#13;
production, tiowering pattern, reproductive eliieienev. yield attributes and their&#13;
relationship with seed yield in 10 munghean genotypes. The experiment was laid out in&#13;
a Completely Randomized Design with Ibur replications. High yielding genotypes&#13;
produced greater number ol opened flowers (range 34.2-45.0 plani1 ) having longer&#13;
flowering duration (range 15-I8 days) than the low yielding ones. In contrast, low,&#13;
yielding genotypes produced fewer opened flowers (range 16.1-2] .0 Plant) and also&#13;
.4&#13;
&#13;
 showed shorter flowering duration (range II - IS days) except M13-46 (21 days). I ugh&#13;
yielding genotypes had higher flower production rate over time than the low yielding&#13;
ones and maximum flower production occurred within 10-12 days after flowering&#13;
started. 1-lowever. high yielding genotypes had inferior performance in reproductive&#13;
eliieicncy (range 52.6-61 .4Q/0) than in low yielding ones (59.5-812%) indicating that&#13;
there Was a scope of increasing yield by improving the reproductive efficiency in high&#13;
yielding genotypes in rnungbean. Iligh yielding genotypes maintained increased teal&#13;
area. TDM. increased flowers and pod numbers plani'. In contrast, low yielding&#13;
genotypes produced shorter and narrower plant canopy, tower flowers and pods plani'.&#13;
Seed yield had highly significant and positive correlation with pod number (r = 0.89**)&#13;
and pod number depended on leaf area (r = 0.75**), TDM (r = 0.84**). raceme&#13;
(r 0.76*) and flower number (r 0.87*t). Genotypes ML3-l7 and ?v113-35 showed&#13;
better perlormance in respect of growth, reproductive, yield and yield contributing&#13;
characters.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>STUDY ON GROWTH AND DRY MATTER PARTITIONING IN GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/323" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>SHARIFUZZAMAN, MD</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/323</id>
<updated>2019-10-02T04:51:36Z</updated>
<published>2008-06-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">STUDY ON GROWTH AND DRY MATTER PARTITIONING IN GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES
SHARIFUZZAMAN, MD
The experiment was carried out at the field laboratory of Bangladesh&#13;
Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh, to investigate the growth,&#13;
some morphological features, dry matter production and its partitioning in&#13;
four groundnut genotypes viz.,&#13;
GM-16, GM-35,&#13;
GM-45 and Dhaka-1 during&#13;
the period from December 2007 to May 2008. The experiment was laid out in&#13;
a randomized complete block design with three replications. Significant&#13;
variations in morpho-physiological features, yield attributes and dry matter&#13;
production and its partitioning into different plant parts were found among&#13;
the four groundnut genotypes. High yielding genotypes had shorter plant&#13;
height, greater branch number than the low yielder, Dhaka-l. The plant&#13;
height, leaf area, leaf area index, total dry matter and absolute growth rate (at&#13;
early growth stage) were superior in Dhaka-1 over its growth period followed&#13;
by GM-35 but Dhaka-1 produced the lowest pod yield due to unfavorable&#13;
DM distribution to the economic yield. In contrast, GM-45 performed&#13;
inferiority in above studied parameters. GM-35 produced the highest pod&#13;
yield (22.2 g plant" and 3.04&#13;
t h&amp;') due to the production of bolder and&#13;
higher number of pods plant'&#13;
while Dhaka-1 showed the lowest pod yield&#13;
although it had the highest number of pods planf' due to production of&#13;
smaller pods. Total dry matter production and its partitioning into pod&#13;
(economic yield) were significantly greater in three genotypes than the&#13;
cultivar, Dhaka-1 with being the highest in GM-35.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-06-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SCREENING OF RICE GENOTYPES AGAJNST LOW TEMPERATLIRE STRESS</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/322" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>NAHAR, KAMRUN</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/322</id>
<updated>2019-10-02T04:51:52Z</updated>
<published>2008-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">SCREENING OF RICE GENOTYPES AGAJNST LOW TEMPERATLIRE STRESS
NAHAR, KAMRUN
The research work was conducted at the Bangladesh Rice Research Institute. Gazipur&#13;
from October 2007 to May 2008 with 244 rice breeding lines obtained from different&#13;
sources. The seeds were sown on IS October 2007 so that the genotypes would have&#13;
the experience of low temperature stress at their vegetative as well as reproductive&#13;
phases. Cluster and Discriminant Function Analysis was perlornied to screen out&#13;
genotypes having better performance with respect to phenotype as well as yield&#13;
perk)nnance. Accordingly, genotypes 177496-31-2-1-3. 1R77504-36-3-3- I.&#13;
BR7528-2R-20-1. 11173689-19-I. 1R62266-42-6-2 and PSBRC68 were selected from&#13;
cluster I. Genotype 8(1358-I was selected from cluster 3. Another genotype RC1358-3&#13;
was selected from the cluster 4 lbr desirable attributes. Geuol\ pes having yield level&#13;
more than 400 g ni' were selected primarily as low temperature tolerant. There were&#13;
short and long duration genotypes in those groups. Spikcict ni'2 played the most&#13;
important role in grouping the genotypes. The combination of yield components was&#13;
quite better in Group I. The genotypes having the highest spikelet number with better&#13;
yield was iotLnd in Group Ill and IV but they had lower thousand-grain weight. The&#13;
maximum and mimmttm temperature around panicle initiation (Pt) were 28.7 "C and&#13;
10.9°C for short duration genotypes and 24.4 and 11.0°C (hr long duration genotypes.&#13;
Solar radiations during those periods were 235.2 and 191.5 Cal cm'2. tue critical low&#13;
temperatures for agronomie P1 (24 (lays to flowering) and reduction division are 18&#13;
and I 9SC. respectively. In reality, the occurrence of low temperature was fur below&#13;
than those of the critical marks. The genotypes encountered low temperature and low&#13;
solar radiation from vegetative to reproductive phases. A few genotypes li&amp;e&#13;
11(77496-3 l-2-t-3-1 (Group 1) and 1R77496-31-2-1-3-2 (Group 11) maintained better&#13;
phenotvpic acceptability. Most of the selected genotypes experienced spikelet&#13;
-  degeneration symptom. The genotypes (Group 1. III and IV) producing huge number&#13;
of spikelets might able to execute panicle differentiation at the initiation of panicle&#13;
development. But at the subsequent stage there must have some growth impairment&#13;
activities. In contrast, the genotypes (Group II and V) which having lower number ol&#13;
spikelet rn'2 might be aifeeted primarily at the diliërentiation stage then at the&#13;
reduction division stage. The varieties which were able to maintain their good&#13;
phenotype were tolerant to low temperature stress. Sonic of the genotypes having an&#13;
exciting level of yield indicated their all-round tolerance to the cold. It may be&#13;
concluded that some of the genotypes could be selected as high yielding and better&#13;
performing genotypes from group I. Ill and IV. The genotypes selected from this&#13;
study have significant tolerance to critical low temperature. 'I he genotypes having&#13;
short growth duration might have the tolerance to withstand low minimum&#13;
temperature and those with long growth duration are appeared to have stress&#13;
avoidance mechanism. As 1)2 between the cluster 2 and cluster 3 was the hiuhest.&#13;
A &#13;
breeders could have the better chance of heterosis crossing between these two groups.&#13;
CONTENTS&#13;
Chapter T
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
