<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Year 2018</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2680" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/2680</id>
<updated>2026-04-17T09:16:40Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T09:16:40Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>PROFITABILITY OF WINTER VEGETABLES CULTIVATION IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADEH</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3833" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>DAS, SARUP KUMAR</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3833</id>
<updated>2022-05-17T07:20:03Z</updated>
<published>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">PROFITABILITY OF WINTER VEGETABLES CULTIVATION IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADEH
DAS, SARUP KUMAR
The present study was designed to analyze the production, cost, return and&#13;
profitability of three winter vegetables (cabbage, cauliflower and tomato) production&#13;
of six villages of Rajbari District in Bangladesh. To achieve the objectives, data were&#13;
collected from 90 vegetable cultivars. Among the selected 90 farmers, 30 were&#13;
cabbage cultivars, 30 were cauliflower cultivars and 30 were tomato cultivars. The&#13;
sample farmers were selected through purposive sampling technique. The major&#13;
findings of the study were: among the winter vegetables, cauliflower production was&#13;
more profitable. Per hectare profitability of growing vegetables from the viewpoints&#13;
of individual farmers was measured in terms of gross return, gross margin and net &#13;
return. Per hectare gross costs of cabbage, cauliflower and tomato production were &#13;
Tk. 127754, Tk. 139735 and Tk. 144246 respectively, and per hectare average yields&#13;
of  cabbage, cauliflower and tomato were estimated at 15265kg/ha 16788 kg/ha, and&#13;
12377 kg/ha, respectively.  Per hectare gross returns of cabbage, cauliflower and&#13;
tomato were Tk. 244240, Tk. 369336 and Tk. 309425, respectively. Per hectare net&#13;
returns of brinjal, country bean and cabbage were Tk. 116486, Tk. 229601, and Tk.&#13;
165179, respectively. It shows that cost of production per hectare was higher for&#13;
tomato than for cabbage and cauliflower. The study also shows that per hectare yield,&#13;
gross returns, gross margin, net return and benefit cost ratio of cauliflower were&#13;
higher than those of cabbage and tomato. Therefore, it is clear that cauliflower&#13;
production was most profitable among the three crops. The major problems of&#13;
cabbage and cauliflower production were insect infestation and for it was low market&#13;
price. High yielding variety should be available before the growing season, it should&#13;
be minimized the seed cost and proper govt. monitor needed for maximizing farmer’s &#13;
profitability.
A thesis&#13;
Submitted to the Faculty of Agribusiness Management &#13;
Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka&#13;
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of &#13;
MASTER OF SCIENCE (MS) &#13;
IN &#13;
DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY STUDIES &#13;
SEMESTER: JULY-DECEMBER, 2018
</summary>
<dc:date>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SOCIO- ECONOMIC STATUS AND MARKETING SYSTEM OF BANANA CULTIVATORS IN NARSINGDI  DISTRICT</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3832" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>SARMIN, NUSRAT</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3832</id>
<updated>2022-05-17T07:16:40Z</updated>
<published>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">SOCIO- ECONOMIC STATUS AND MARKETING SYSTEM OF BANANA CULTIVATORS IN NARSINGDI  DISTRICT
SARMIN, NUSRAT
The study was conducted to identify the socio- economic status and marketing&#13;
system of banana cult ivator’s associat ion between two categorical indicators of&#13;
sampled respondents, marketing channel of banana in study area and examine the&#13;
problems of banana producers in production and marketing by using the concerned&#13;
software SPSS-21(Statistical Package for the Social Science). The data have been&#13;
collected through pre-designed and pre-tested questionnaire from 60 farm&#13;
households. On the basis of education level, major part is primary were 40%. The&#13;
average annual agricultural income estimated as 108596.49 TK. from other crops,&#13;
152631.58 TK. from livestock, 65789.47 TK. from fishery and 145357.14 TK. from&#13;
others. And average annual non-agricultural income estimated as 46500.00 TK.&#13;
from land rent, 106000.00 TK. from house rent, 180000.00 TK. from wage/salary&#13;
and 221953.49 TK. from others. Average total land of respondent was 1.84 acres,&#13;
average cultivated land was 1.64 acres and average banana cultivated area was .85&#13;
acres. There is statistically less significant relationship between education and&#13;
occupation also between education and family size, farmer categories and types of&#13;
banana cultivation respectively but significant relationship between farmer&#13;
categories and credit excess of banana cultivators. It was estimated that average&#13;
annual total cost of production of banana was TK. 372,400, while gross return and&#13;
net returns per farm were Tk. 550,400and Tk. 178,000 respectively. The overall&#13;
benefit cost ratio of banana farming came out to 1.48 indicating that one Taka&#13;
investment resulted in a net benefit of Tk.1.48. The marketing cost for petty trader,&#13;
wholesaler and retailer was Tk. 21.12, Tk.16.05 and Tk.13.50 respectively. Retailer&#13;
was the last intermediary of marketing channel. They were directly involved with&#13;
customer. So retailer achived higher gross margin TK 50. The marketing cost was&#13;
lowest for retailer and wholesaler and their gross margin were higher than other&#13;
intermediaries. So, the net margin was highest for retailer and wholesaler Tk 36.5&#13;
and 28.95 respectively. The major problem found in the study was insect and&#13;
disease infestation.
A Thesis&#13;
Submitted to the Faculty of Agribusiness Management &#13;
Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka,&#13;
in partial fulfillment of the requirements &#13;
for the degree of &#13;
 &#13;
MASTER OF SCIENCE&#13;
IN &#13;
DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY STUDIES &#13;
SEMESTER: JULY-DECEMBER, 2018
</summary>
<dc:date>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>FLOATING VEGETABLE GARDENING IN BANGLADESH: A WAY TO IMPROVE INCOME AND LIVELIHOOD OF THE FARMERS</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3831" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>RANA, MD. SHOHEL</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3831</id>
<updated>2022-05-17T07:13:54Z</updated>
<published>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">FLOATING VEGETABLE GARDENING IN BANGLADESH: A WAY TO IMPROVE INCOME AND LIVELIHOOD OF THE FARMERS
RANA, MD. SHOHEL
The objectives of this study were to assess the socio-economic characteristics&#13;
and the effect of floating gardening on income and livelihood of the farmers.&#13;
The study was conducted in Gopalganj and Pirojpur district. Data were&#13;
collected from the randomly selected 60 respondents during August to&#13;
September, 2019. Descriptive statistics was used for analysis. Total variable&#13;
cost of floating bed vegetable production were Tk. 1856, Tk. 1857, Tk. 1876&#13;
and Tk. 1922 per bed for tomato, brinjal, chili and red amaranth respectively.&#13;
Per bed total cost of producing vegetable per year was found to be Tk. 2651,&#13;
Tk. 2638, Tk. 2640 and Tk. 2734 for tomato, brinjal, chili and red amaranth&#13;
respectively. Gross margin was found to be Tk. 2734, Tk. 2524, Tk. 2714 and&#13;
Tk. 2716 per bed for tomato, brinjal, chili and red amaranth respectively. Net&#13;
return was estimated as Tk. 1939, Tk. 1743, Tk. 1950 and Tk. 1904 per bed for&#13;
tomato, brinjal, chili and red amaranth respectively. Floating vegetable&#13;
gardening improves the livelihood status of the growers. Lack of capital was&#13;
the severe problem followed by lack of awareness of farmers regarding floating&#13;
gardening system.
</summary>
<dc:date>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS AND RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY OF JUTE IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF GOPALGANJ  DISTRICT IN BANGLADESH</title>
<link href="http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3817" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>SONYA</name>
</author>
<id>http://localhost:8080/handle/123456789/3817</id>
<updated>2022-04-25T08:48:01Z</updated>
<published>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS AND RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY OF JUTE IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF GOPALGANJ  DISTRICT IN BANGLADESH
SONYA
Jute has always played an important role in the economy of Bangladesh.The&#13;
objectives of the present study to determine the socioeconomic condition,&#13;
profitability, resource use efficiency, problems of the farmers. The present study&#13;
was conducted at Muksudpur Upazilla of Gopalganj district of Bangladesh. Simple&#13;
random sampling was used to select the respondents. To achieve the purpose of the&#13;
study total 60 respondents were selected. The amount of human labor used for jute&#13;
cultivation was 115 man days per hectare. Total cost of human labor amounted to&#13;
Tk. 40250 per hectare. Total variable cost was Tk 57735 per hectare for jute&#13;
production. Per hectare interest on operating capital was Tk 1924.5. The study&#13;
revealed that total cost, gross return and net return of the jute production is Tk.&#13;
77659.5, Tk. 96,016.50 as well as Tk. 18357 respectively. It was evident from the&#13;
study that the benefit cost ratio of jute farming was 1.24. In the study area, use of&#13;
insecticide, fertilizer and seed for jute farming was under used as well as labour and&#13;
cowdung were over used. To determine the factors that affecting the production and&#13;
gross return Cobb Douglas Production function was used where labor, seed, as well&#13;
as fertilizer were statistically significant.  In the study area various problems which&#13;
were faced by farmers such as lack of capital, high price of fertilizers and&#13;
insecticides, scarcity of good quality seeds, attack by pest and disease, lack of&#13;
training, lack of adequate transport facilities, lack of storage facilities, lack of&#13;
marketing facilities, and lack of market information. To solve the problems some&#13;
recommendations were made.
Submitted to the Faculty of Agribusiness Management&#13;
Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka &#13;
In partial fulfillment of the requirements&#13;
For the degree of &#13;
MASTER OF SCIENCE&#13;
IN &#13;
Development and Poverty Studies&#13;
SEMESTER: July-December, 2018
</summary>
<dc:date>2018-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
